commit AGENTS.md
Validate Operations / validate-operations (push) Has been cancelled

This commit is contained in:
NiccoloN
2026-05-27 14:07:34 +02:00
parent d609e84054
commit 532cac8246
2 changed files with 85 additions and 1 deletions
-1
View File
@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
.claude .claude
.codex .codex
AGENTS.md
CMakeUserPresets.json CMakeUserPresets.json
+85
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
- Always read the full README.md before building or running any commands.
- Build command: `cmake --build /home/nico/raptor/raptor/cmake-build-release --target onnx-mlir -j 30`
- Never use `ninja` directly — it bypasses cmake's configuration and invalidates the build cache.
# Code changes
- Keep changes minimal and localized to the relevant parts of the code.
- Preserve the existing naming conventions and coding style used in the surrounding code.
- Keep code easy to read, well organized, and suitable for future extensibility.
- Prefer clear naming and structure over comments. Add comments only when they materially improve clarity.
- Do not rename symbols, move files, or restructure modules unless that is necessary for the requested change.
# Working style
- Infer style and conventions from the existing code before introducing new patterns.
- When several implementation options are possible, prefer the simplest one that fits the current architecture and minimizes churn.
- Avoid broad refactors unless I explicitly ask for them.
# Responses
- When showing code in chat, make it easy to copy-paste into the codebase.
- Keep outputs focused on the changed parts.
- At the end of the response, briefly list any bad practices, mistakes, or cleaner alternatives you noticed, separate from the main solution.
# Guidelines
## 1. Think Before Coding
**Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.**
Before implementing:
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
## 2. Simplicity First
**Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.**
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
## 3. Surgical Changes
**Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.**
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
## 4. Goal-Driven Execution
**Define success criteria. Loop until verified.**
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
```
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
```
Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
---
**These guidelines are working if:** fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.